The Corticocuneate Pathway in the Cat: Relations among Terminal Distribution Patterns, Cytoarchitecture, and Single Neuron Functional Properties

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
A combined anatomical and physiological strategy was used to investigate the organization of the corticocuneate pathway in the cat. The distribution of the corticocuneate projection was mapped by means of the anterograde horseradish peroxidase (HRP) labeling technique and correlated with the nuclear cytoarchitecture in Nissl and Golgi material, the distribution of retrogradely labeled relay cells after HRP injections in the ventrobasal complex of the thalamus, and the topographic organization derived from single-and multiunit recordings in the decerebrate, unanesthetized cat. This approach provided details about the arrangement of the corticocuneate pathway that were not available from previous studies with anterograde degeneration methods. On the basis of cytoarchitectonic and connectional features, a number of subdivisions are identified in the cuneate nucleus, each of which is associated with characteristic functional properties. In agreement with previous studies, it is found that a large portion of the cuneate nucleus, the middle dorsal part (MCd), is exclusively devoted to the representation of cutaneous receptive fields on the digits. This “core” region contains more thalamic projecting neurons than any other subdivision of the cuneate nucleus. A topographic arrangement also exists in the subdivisions of the rostral cuneate and of the nuclear region ventral to MCd, although in these, receptive fields are larger and predominantly, but not exclusively, related to deep receptors and involve the arm, shoulder, and trunk. Observations on corticocuneate projections were based on injections, mainly focused on functional subdivisions of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) as described by McKenna et al (1981). Although cortical projections are mainly to cuneate regions other than its core, a significant proportion of fibers from the region of SI where the digits are represented (particularly area 3b) do project to the MCd region of the cuneate nucleus. Similarly, nuclear areas associated with receptive fields on the arm and trunk are labeled after injection in SI arm and trunk regions, respectively. Thus, a close topographic relationship appears to exist between the somatosensory cortex and cuneate regions related to the same body representation, although nuclear regions in which receptive fields on the neck area are represented receive very sparse or no detectable cortical projections even when the injection of the tracer involves the entire sensorimotor cortex. The topographic arrangement of SI projections upon the cuneate nucleus suggests that a similar pattern exists in both structures with regard to the relative representations of distal versus proximal and deep versus cutaneous receptive fields (e.g., “core” vs. “shell” organization), and that cuneate regions preferentially related to either of these classes of receptive fields receive direct connections from the corresponding regions in SI. A comparison of the results from cats with tracer injections in areas 4 and 3b reveals that the projections from the former is denser than that arising from the latter and that their territories of termination largely overlap in the ventral portions of the cuneate nucleus. However, cortical projections to MCd may be derived from the somatosensory cortex with no contribution from area 4. The demonstration of the relative selectivity of cortical projections from different cytoarchitectonic and functional cortical areas to cuneate regions identified here provides a structural basis for the elucidation of the physiological and behavioral observations, particularly on cortical modulation of somatosensory transmission during movements.