Interpersonal aggression as a function of subject's sex, subject's sex role identification, opponent's sex, and degree of provocation1
- 1 June 1979
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Personality
- Vol. 47 (2) , 317-329
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00205.x
Abstract
Ninety-five undergraduates served as subjects in an experiment where they could administer electric shock to an opponent and receive the same from an opponent. The independent variables were subject's sex, subject's sex role identification (as measured by the Bem Sex Role Inventory), opponent's sex, as well as degree of provocation from the opponent. Aggression was defined as level of shock chosen by the subject for the opponent. The results indicated that masculine subjects facing a male opponent were more aggressive than individuals of other sex role identifications whether or not they were provoked. It was also found that masculine males were more aggressive than other males or anyof the females. Furthermore, opponent's sex influenced the males' aggressiveness but had no effect on the degree of aggression in females. Finally, aggression increased in all subjects following increases in provocation. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for pyschological androgyny.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The enigma of androgyny: Differential implications for males and females?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978
- The enigma of androgyny: Differential implications for males and females?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978
- Androgyny, sex-typing, and the perception of masculinity-femininity in handwritingsJournal of Research in Personality, 1977
- Are women always less aggressive than men? A review of the experimental literature.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- Are women always less aggressive than men? A review of the experimental literature.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977
- Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976
- Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives.American Psychologist, 1973