Embryophytes have equivalent sexual phenotypes and breeding systems: why not a common terminology to describe them?
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Botany
- Vol. 82 (6) , 816-825
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1995.tb15694.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 84 references indexed in Scilit:
- A GENETICAL INVESTIGATION IN SCOLOPENDRIUM VULGAREHereditas, 2010
- Inbreeding in Natural Populations of the Annual Polyploid Fern Ceratopteris thalictroides (Parkeriaceae)Systematic Botany, 1991
- Spatial Patterns and Sex Ratios in Dioecious and Monoecious Mosses of the Genus SplachnumThe Bryologist, 1990
- Automixis: its distribution and statusBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1986
- The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms I. DichogamyNew Zealand Journal of Botany, 1986
- Evolution of Sexual Systems in Flowering PlantsAnnals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 1981
- Sexual strategies in plants III. A quantitative method for describing the gender of plantsNew Zealand Journal of Botany, 1980
- Parental strategies of angiospermsNew Zealand Journal of Botany, 1979
- An experimental study of the reproductive biology and hybridization in the European and North American species of EquisetumBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 1979
- The Gametophytes of the Victorian Blechnaceae. II. Doodia aspera R. Br., D. media R. Br., and D. caudata R. Br.: A comparison with three extra-Australian Genera, Brainea, Sadleria, and WoodwardiaAustralian Journal of Botany, 1969