Are IPOs Really Underpriced?
Top Cited Papers
- 26 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 17 (3) , 811-848
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhg055
Abstract
While IPOs have been underpriced by more than 10% during the past two decades, we find that in a sample of more than 2,000 IPOs from 1980 to 1997, the median IPO was significantly overvalued at the offer price relative to valuations based on industry peer price multiples. This overvaluation ranges from 14% to 50% depending on the peer matching criteria. Cross-sectional regressions show that “overvalued” IPOs provide high first-day returns, but low long-run risk-adjusted returns. These overvalued IPOs have lower profitability, higher accruals, and higher analyst growth forecasts than “undervalued” IPOs. Ex post, the projected high growth of overvalued IPOs fails to materialize, while their profitability declines from pre-IPO levels. These results suggest IPO investors are deceived by optimistic growth forecasts and pay insufficient attention to profitability in valuing IPOs.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of Lockups in Initial Public OfferingsThe Review of Financial Studies, 2003
- Strategic IPO underpricing, information momentum, and lockup expiration sellingJournal of Financial Economics, 2002
- Who Is My Peer? A Valuation‐Based Approach to the Selection of Comparable FirmsJournal of Accounting Research, 2002
- How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issuesPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Inference in Long‐Horizon Event Studies: A Bayesian Approach with Application to Initial Public OfferingsThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- A model of investor sentiment1We are grateful to the NSF for financial support, and to Oliver Blanchard, Alon Brav, John Campbell (a referee), John Cochrane, Edward Glaeser, J.B. Heaton, Danny Kahneman, David Laibson, Owen Lamont, Drazen Prelec, Jay Ritter (a referee), Ken Singleton, Dick Thaler, an anonymous referee, and the editor, Bill Schwert, for comments.1Journal of Financial Economics, 1998
- Underwriter Reputation, Initial Returns, and the Long‐Run Performance of IPO StocksThe Journal of Finance, 1998
- Myth or Reality? The Long-Run Underperformance of Initial Public Offerings: Evidence from Venture and Nonventure Capital-Backed CompaniesThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statisticsJournal of Financial Economics, 1997
- Signalling by underpricing in the IPO marketJournal of Financial Economics, 1989