Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine Infusion in Patients with Septic Shock
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 28 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 358 (9) , 877-887
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa067373
Abstract
Vasopressin is commonly used as an adjunct to catecholamines to support blood pressure in refractory septic shock, but its effect on mortality is unknown. We hypothesized that low-dose vasopressin as compared with norepinephrine would decrease mortality among patients with septic shock who were being treated with conventional (catecholamine) vasopressors. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned patients who had septic shock and were receiving a minimum of 5 μg of norepinephrine per minute to receive either low-dose vasopressin (0.01 to 0.03 U per minute) or norepinephrine (5 to 15 μg per minute) in addition to open-label vasopressors. All vasopressor infusions were titrated and tapered according to protocols to maintain a target blood pressure. The primary end point was the mortality rate 28 days after the start of infusions. A total of 778 patients underwent randomization, were infused with the study drug (396 patients received vasopressin, and 382 norepinephrine), and were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference between the vasopressin and norepinephrine groups in the 28-day mortality rate (35.4% and 39.3%, respectively; P=0.26) or in 90-day mortality (43.9% and 49.6%, respectively; P=0.11). There were no significant differences in the overall rates of serious adverse events (10.3% and 10.5%, respectively; P=1.00). In the prospectively defined stratum of less severe septic shock, the mortality rate was lower in the vasopressin group than in the norepinephrine group at 28 days (26.5% vs. 35.7%, P=0.05); in the stratum of more severe septic shock, there was no significant difference in 28-day mortality (44.0% and 42.5%, respectively; P=0.76). A test for heterogeneity between these two study strata was not significant (P=0.10). Low-dose vasopressin did not reduce mortality rates as compared with norepinephrine among patients with septic shock who were treated with catecholamine vasopressors. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN94845869.)Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shockCritical Care Medicine, 2004
- Current Epidemiology of Septic ShockAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2003
- Beneficial Effects of Short-term Vasopressin Infusion during Severe Septic ShockAnesthesiology, 2002
- Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Physiology of Vasopressin Relevant to Management of Septic ShockChest, 2001
- The Pathogenesis of Vasodilatory ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of careCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- Vasopressin pressor hypersensitivity in vasodilatory septic shockCritical Care Medicine, 1997
- Elevation of Systemic Oxygen Delivery in the Treatment of Critically Ill PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Renovascular resistance and noradrenalineAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1975