The phenomenological movement: implications for nursing research
- 1 October 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 22 (4) , 791-799
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22040791.x
Abstract
This paper presents a comparison of the phenomenologies of Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger with the aim of highlighting some of the critical distinctions between these two 'schools' of phenomenology concerning the methodological implications of each approach for nursing research. Specifically, the paper examines: the implications of epistemology versus ontology; issues relating to validity; the involvement of the researcher, and aspects relating to interpretation.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trailJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1994
- Issues in phenomenology for researchers of nursingJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1994
- Phenomenology without phenomena: a discussion of the use of phenomenology to examine expertise in long‐term care of elderly patientsJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1994
- The Nature of Scientific TruthNursing Science Quarterly, 1992
- A Heideggerian phenomenologic perspective on the concept of the personAdvances in Nursing Science, 1989
- Critical Thinking: Schemata Vs. SkillsTheory & Research in Social Education, 1989
- Husserl revisited: The forgotten distinction between psychology and phenomenology.American Psychologist, 1986
- The problem of rigor in qualitative researchAdvances in Nursing Science, 1986
- Quality of lifeAdvances in Nursing Science, 1985
- Action as a Text: Gadamer's Hermeneutics and the Social Scientific Analysis of ActionJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1984