Money and Trust: Relationships between Patients, Physicians, and Health Plans
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Duke University Press in Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
- Vol. 23 (4) , 687-695
- https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-23-4-687
Abstract
In response to three articles on managed care by Allen Buchanan, David Mechanic, and Ezekiel Emanual and Lee Goldman (this issue), I discuss doctor-patient and organization-member trust and the moral obligations of those relationships. Trust in managed care organizations (providers of and payers for health care) stands in stark contrast to the current contractual model of health insurance purchase, but is more coherent with consumer expectations and with the provider role of such organizations. Such trust is likely to differ from that between doctors and patients. Financial reimbursement systems for physicians, one example of organizational change in our health system, can be evaluated for their impact on both kinds of trust according to their intrusiveness, openness, and goals. Although involving managed care enrollees in value-laden decisions that affect them is commendable, restrictions on or regulation of physician incentive systems may be better accomplished on a national level.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Talking Heads and Sleeping Citizens: Health Policy Making in a DemocracyJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1996
- Allocating Health Care: Cost-Utility Analysis, Informed Democratic Decision Making, or the Veil of Ignorance?Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1996
- Changing Medical Organization and the Erosion of TrustThe Milbank Quarterly, 1996
- Medicine, Money, And MoralsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1993
- Informed Consent to Rationing DecisionsThe Milbank Quarterly, 1993
- Consensus of Expertise: The Role of Consensus of Experts in Formulating Public Policy and Estimating FactsJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1991