Associations between community income and cancer incidence in Canada and the United States
Open Access
- 15 August 2000
- Vol. 89 (4) , 901-912
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20000815)89:4<901::aid-cncr25>3.0.co;2-i
Abstract
BACKGROUND Associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and the incidence of cancer have been reported previously in the U.S. Canada has more comprehensive health care and social programs than the U.S. The purpose of this study was to compare the strength of associations between SES and cancer incidence in Canada and the U.S. METHODS The regions studied were the Canadian province of Ontario and the areas of the U.S. covered by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. The populations at risk were defined using the 1991 Canadian Census and the 1990 U.S. Census. The populations of Ontario and of the SEER areas of the U.S. were each divided into deciles on the basis of median household income. Population‐based cancer registries were used to identify incident cases. Age‐standardized incidence rates for all major groups of malignant diseases were calculated for each SES decile in Ontario and in the U.S. Income‐associated incidence gradients observed in Ontario and the U.S. were compared. RESULTS The incidence of most types of cancer was similar in Ontario and the U.S. In both countries, there were moderately strong, inverse associations between income level and the incidence of carcinomas of the cervix, the head and neck region, the lung, and the gastrointestinal tract. In both Ontario and the U.S., several of these diseases were twice as common in the bottom income decile than they were in the top decile. In contrast, carcinoma of the female breast and carcinoma of the prostate were more common among higher income communities in both countries, but the observed associations were weaker in Ontario. CONCLUSIONS Despite Canada's universal health insurance and more comprehensive social security system, the association between lower socioeconomic status and the incidence of many common cancers is just as strong in Ontario as it is in the U.S. The mechanisms responsible for these associations require further investigation. Cancer 2000;89:901–12. © 2000 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Causes of Cervical Cancer in the Philippines: a Case-Control StudyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1998
- An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario, and Detroit, Michigan, metropolitan areas.American Journal of Public Health, 1997
- Barriers to follow‐up of abnormal screening mammograms among low‐income minority womenEthnicity & Health, 1996
- Differences in Cancer Incidence and Mortality Among Socio-Economic GroupsScandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 1995
- Cancer risk and social inequalities in Italy.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1994
- Socioeconomic Status and Breast Cancer Incidence: A Prospective Cohort StudyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1994
- Socioeconomic status: the prime indicator of premature death in AustraliaJournal of Biosocial Science, 1993
- Socioeconomic status and cancer mortality and incidence in MelbourneEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Trends in cervical and breast cancer in Iceland. A statistical evaluation of trends in incidence and mortality for the period 1955–1989, their relation to screening and prediction to the year 2000International Journal of Cancer, 1991
- Aspects of the Rationale for the Women's Health TrialJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1988