Comparison of conventional Lewis-Tanner two-stage oesophagectomy with the synchronous two-team approach
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 82 (1) , 95-97
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800820132
Abstract
Twenty‐seven patients with oesophageal carcinoma had subtotal oesophagectomy by the Lewis‐Tanner operation (group 1, n = 14) or a synchronous modification (group 2, n = 13). Synchronous operations were completed more quickly (230 versus 305 min, P versus 120 min, P versus 30mmHg, P versus 3 units, P <0·01). Four patients in group 1 suffered significant postoperative complications, compared with seven in group 2; three postoperative deaths occurred in group 2. This study suggests that the synchronous two‐team oesophagectomy produces a higher incidence of complications than the conventional operation. Continued use of the Lewis‐Tanner two‐stage oesophagectomy is recommended for patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- SYNCHRONOUS COMBINED OESOPHAGECTOMY: A REVIEW OF 20 CASESAnz Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Pulmonary complications after subtotal oesophagectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Synchronous Combined Abdomino‐Thoraco‐Cervical (Esophagectomy1Anz Journal of Surgery, 1975
- The Present Position of Carcinoma of the OesophagusPostgraduate Medical Journal, 1947
- The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle thirdBritish Journal of Surgery, 1946