‘If Only More Candidates Came Forward’: Supply-Side Explanations of Candidate Selection in Britain
- 1 July 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 23 (3) , 373-408
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400006657
Abstract
In a familiar observation, members of the British House of Commons are demographically unrepresentative of the British population in terms of gender, race, education and class. This article takes a fresh look at the reasons why this is the case, based on data from the British Candidate Study, 1992. This study analyses the background, experience and attitudes of MPs, candidates, applicants, party members and voters. By comparing strata we can see whether the outcome of the selection process reflects the supply of those willing to stand for Parliament or the demands of local party activists when adopting candidates for local constituencies.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- From Asylum to Community: Mental Health Policy in Modern America. Gerald N. GrobIsis, 1992
- Candidate selectionContemporary Record, 1991
- Activism and office: Women and local government in ScotlandLocal Government Studies, 1985
- Women Candidates in the 1983 General ElectionParliamentary Affairs, 1984
- The Electoral Costs of Being a Woman in the 1979 British General ElectionComparative Politics, 1983
- Life-style constraints on formal political participation—Why so few women local councillors in Britain?Electoral Studies, 1983
- Candidate Selection in the Labour Party: What the Selectors SeekBritish Journal of Political Science, 1983
- Women local councillors — a reply to BristowLocal Government Studies, 1982
- Women councillors — An explanation of the under‐representation of women in local governmentLocal Government Studies, 1980
- Initial Recruitment of Elected Officials in the U.S.--A ModelThe Journal of Politics, 1962