ABCG2 Pharmacogenetics
Open Access
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 10 (17) , 5889-5894
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-0144
Abstract
Tumor grade is an established indicator of breast cancer outcome, although considerable heterogeneity exists even within-grade. Around 25% of grade III invasive ductal breast carcinomas are associated with a “basal” phenotype, and these tumors are reported to be a distinct subgroup. We have investigated whether this group of breast cancers has a distinguishing pattern of genetic alterations and which of these may relate to the different clinical outcome of these patients. We performed comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis on 43 grade III invasive ductal breast carcinomas positive for basal cytokeratin 14, as well as 43 grade- and age-matched CK14-negative controls, all with up to 25 years (median, 7 years) of clinical follow-up. Significant differences in CGH alterations were seen between the two groups in terms of mean number of changes (CK14+ve − 6.5, CK14−ve − 10.3; P = 0.0012) and types of alterations at chromosomes 4q, 7q, 8q, 9p, 13q, 16p, 17p, 17q, 19p, 19q, 20p, 20q and Xp. Supervised and unsupervised algorithms separated the two groups on CGH data alone with 76% and 74% accuracy, respectively. Hierarchical clustering revealed distinct subgroups, one of which contained 18 (42%) of the CK14+ve tumors. This subgroup had significantly shorter overall survival (P = 0.0414) than other grade III tumors, regardless of CK14 status, and was an independent prognostic marker (P = 0.031). These data provide evidence that the “basal” phenotype on its own does not convey a poor prognosis. Basal tumors are also heterogeneous with only a subset, identifiable by pattern of genetic alterations, exhibiting a shorter overall survival. Robust characterization of this basal group is necessary if it is to have a major impact on management of patients with breast cancer.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Flat-Fixed Dosing of IrinotecanClinical Cancer Research, 2004
- Genetic Variants in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 Gene Predict the Risk of Severe Neutropenia of IrinotecanJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- The breast cancer resistance protein protects against a major chlorophyll-derived dietary phototoxin and protoporphyriaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002
- ATP ‐Binding Cassette ( ABC ) TransportersPublished by Wiley ,2002
- UGT1A1*28 polymorphism as a determinant of irinotecan disposition and toxicityThe Pharmacogenomics Journal, 2002
- Transport of 7-Ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) by Breast Cancer Resistance Protein ABCG2 in Human Lung Cancer CellsBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2001
- Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Directly Confers SN-38 Resistance of Lung Cancer CellsBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2001
- Human liver UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms involved in the glucuronidation of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecinXenobiotica, 2001
- Ethnic differences in catechol O-methyltransferase pharmacogeneticsPharmacogenetics, 1998
- Genetic predisposition to the metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11). Role of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 in the glucuronidation of its active metabolite (SN-38) in human liver microsomes.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1998