A Bayesian fixed effects analysis of the Mantel–Haenszel model applied to meta‐analysis
- 26 July 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 21 (16) , 2295-2312
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1048
Abstract
When performing a meta analysis, it is often necessary to combine results from several 2 × 2 contingency tables. The Mantel–Haenszel model assumes a common measure of association between the treatment and outcome variables across the tables. A Bayesian method is described for drawing inferences regarding the measure of association, for checking the plausibility of the Mantel–Haenszel model, and for drawing inferences regarding the success rates for the individual studies. While the methodology is readily extendable to random effects models, a fixed effects approach avoids the complex statistical modelling of a mixture distribution which is required for the good application of random effects models. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methodsStatistics in Medicine, 1999
- Are antibiotics indicated as initial treatment for children with acute otitis media? A meta-analysisBMJ, 1997
- Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigatedBMJ, 1994
- Bayesian Marginal InferenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1989
- Meta-Analysis in Clinical ResearchAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- Bayesian Full Rank Marginalization for Two-Way Contingency TablesJournal of Educational Statistics, 1986
- Treatment with Histamine H2Antagonists in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal HemorrhageNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Some data-analytic modifications to Bayes-Stein estimationAnnals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 1984
- Bayesian methods for binomial dataBiometrika, 1972
- The Measure of Association in a 2 × 2 TableJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1963