Selection of patients for psoriasis clinical trials: a survey of the recent dermatological literature
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Dermatological Treatment
- Vol. 3 (4) , 171-176
- https://doi.org/10.3109/09546639209088717
Abstract
Reports of 62 psoriasis clinical trials listed in the Cumulated Index Medicos for the years 1988 and 1989 and published only in leading dermatological journals were evaluated for different elements of research methodology concerned with the recruitment of subjects. The evaluation included items such as eligibility criteria, the sampling process, ethical considerations and sample size calculation. Major weaknesses in the description of all aspects of the recruitment procedure were demonstrated. For example, a quantitative disease activity criterion at entry was mentioned in 15% of the studies, consecutive patients were included in 5% of the trials, sufficient information on ethical approval was given in 16% of the studies, and a pre-study sample size calculation was not mentioned in any of the trials.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical research in dermatology: Can we achieve our potential?Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1991
- Topical antibiotics for the treatment of acne vulgaris: A critical evaluation of the literature on their clinical benefit and comparative efficacyJournal of Dermatological Treatment, 1990
- Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritisControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Low-dose cyclosporin A in severe psoriasis. A double-blind studyBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1988
- Recruitment experience in clinical trials: Literature summary and annotated bibliographyControlled Clinical Trials, 1987
- Content of reports on clinical trials: A critical reviewControlled Clinical Trials, 1984
- Reporting on Methods in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Randomised controlled trials: sampling.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1982
- Reporting standards and research strategies for controlled trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1980
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978