Meta‐analysis for descriptive research
- 1 December 1992
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Research in Nursing & Health
- Vol. 15 (6) , 467-475
- https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770150609
Abstract
Although nurses have begun to use meta‐analysis, a review of the nursing literature demonstrates that its use has not been maximized. Meta‐analysis can be employed to synthesize descriptive as well as experimental research, yet attention in nursing has focused almost exclusively on meta‐analysis techniques for, and meta‐analytic studies of, experimental research. Furthermore, nursing literature has emphasized use of the effect size index (d) rather than the correlation index (r); the latter may, in some cases, be the more suitable metric, particularly with meta‐analysis of correlational studies. An argument is made for the value of meta‐analysis as a technique for integrating descriptive research, and an overview of different meta‐analytic approaches to data analysis using the correlational index with descriptive research is provided.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-Analysis in the BreechScience, 1990
- Meta-Analysis of a Narrative ReviewWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 1990
- The Effects of Relaxation Training On Clinical SymptonsNursing Research, 1989
- Effects of Educational Interventions In Diabetes CareNursing Research, 1988
- When should nurses use research findings?Applied Nursing Research, 1988
- Applying tests of combined significance in meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1987
- Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions: The Codebook as a Research InstrumentWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 1986
- The Designs and Methods Of Published Nursing ResearchNursing Research, 1985
- Meta‐Analysis: A Perspective for Research SynthesisImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1984