Urban Ecological Systems: Linking Terrestrial Ecological, Physical, and Socioeconomic Components of Metropolitan Areas
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Vol. 32 (1) , 127-157
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012
Abstract
▪ Abstract Ecological studies of terrestrial urban systems have been approached along several kinds of contrasts: ecology in as opposed to ecology of cities; biogeochemical compared to organismal perspectives, land use planning versus biological, and disciplinary versus interdisciplinary. In order to point out how urban ecological studies are poised for significant integration, we review key aspects of these disparate literatures. We emphasize an open definition of urban systems that accounts for the exchanges of material and influence between cities and surrounding landscapes. Research on ecology in urban systems highlights the nature of the physical environment, including urban climate, hydrology, and soils. Biotic research has studied flora, fauna, and vegetation, including trophic effects of wildlife and pets. Unexpected interactions among soil chemistry, leaf litter quality, and exotic invertebrates exemplify the novel kinds of interactions that can occur in urban systems. Vegetation and faunal responses suggest that the configuration of spatial heterogeneity is especially important in urban systems. This insight parallels the concern in the literature on the ecological dimensions of land use planning. The contrasting approach of ecology of cities has used a strategy of biogeochemical budgets, ecological footprints, and summaries of citywide species richness. Contemporary ecosystem approaches have begun to integrate organismal, nutrient, and energetic approaches, and to show the need for understanding the social dimensions of urban ecology. Social structure and the social allocation of natural and institutional resources are subjects that are well understood within social sciences, and that can be readily accommodated in ecosystem models of metropolitan areas. Likewise, the sophisticated understanding of spatial dimensions of social differentiation has parallels with concepts and data on patch dynamics in ecology and sets the stage for comprehensive understanding of urban ecosystems. The linkages are captured in the human ecosystem framework.Keywords
This publication has 85 references indexed in Scilit:
- The human ecosystem Part I: The human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem managementSociety & Natural Resources, 1997
- Forest fragmentation and its effect on species diversity in sub-urban coppice forests in JapanForest Ecology and Management, 1995
- Differences in Monterey pine pest populations in urban and natural forestsForest Ecology and Management, 1992
- Habitat association of mammals in Syracuse, New YorkUrban Ecology, 1986
- Forest area characteristics for metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties of three northeastern states of the United StatesUrban Ecology, 1984
- Influence of adjacent land use on understory vegetation of New York forestsUrban Ecology, 1984
- Species structure and soil characteristics of five urban forest sites along the New Jersey PalisadesUrban Ecology, 1984
- A study of human impact on an urban forest remnant: Redwood Bush, Tawa, near Wellington, New ZealandNew Zealand Journal of Botany, 1979
- A typology for the urban ecosystem and its relationship to larger biogeographical landscape unitsUrban Ecology, 1979
- City size and the urban heat islandAtmospheric Environment (1967), 1973