Comparison of Percutaneous Versus Surgical Revascularization of Severe Unprotected Left Main Coronary Stenosis in Matched Patients
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 101 (2) , 169-172
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.08.054
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous Treatment With Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Versus Bypass Surgery for Unprotected Left Main StenosisCirculation, 2006
- Comparison Between Coronary Angioplasty and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis (the Bologna Registry)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery DiseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention—Summary ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Comparing apples and orangesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2002
- Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Unprotected Left Main Trunk Percutaneous Revascularization in 279 PatientsCirculation, 2001
- Seven-year outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) by treatment and diabetic statusJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE)Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1999
- Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity ScoresAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- ASCERTAINMENT OF VITAL STATUS THROUGH THE NATIONAL DEATH INDEX AND THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985