Optimizing Sampling Strategies for Estimating Quality-adjusted Life Years
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 17 (4) , 431-438
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9701700408
Abstract
Accurate estimation of quality of life is critical to cost-effectiveness analysis. Never theless, development of sampling algorithms to maximize the accuracy and efficiency of estimated quality of life has received little consideration to date. This paper presents a method to optimize sampling strategies for estimating quality-adjusted life years. In particular, the authors address the questions of when to sample and how many ob servations to sample at each sampling time, assuming realistically that the sample variance of quality of life is not constant over time. The method is particularly useful for the design problems researchers face when time or research budget constraints limit the number of individuals that can be surveyed to estimate quality of life. The article focuses on cross-sectional sampling. The method proposed requires some knowledge of survival in the population of interest, the approximate variances in utilities at various points along the curve, and the general shape of the quality-adjusted survival curve. Such data are frequently available from disease registries, the literature, or previous studies. Key words: health-related quality of life; utility; quality-adjusted life years; variance; survival; cost-effectiveness; sampling; cross-sectional sampling. (Med Decis Making 1997;17:431-438)Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating the costs attributable to a disease with application to ovarian cancerJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- Statistical analysis of cost outcomes in a randomized controlled clinical trialHealth Economics, 1994
- In Search of Power and Significance: Issues in the Design and Analysis of Stochastic Cost-Effectiveness Studies in Health CareMedical Care, 1994
- Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluationControlled Clinical Trials, 1991