Patients not seen in three years: will invitations for health checks be of benefit?
- 1 August 1991
- journal article
- Vol. 41 (349) , 335-8
Abstract
An attempt has been made to evaluate the evidence for the likely benefit or otherwise, of the obligatory three-yearly checks as defined within the terms of service for doctors in general practice introduced to British general practitioners in April 1990. The content, interval, age groups, ethics, organizational cost, yield and outcome of the three-yearly checks are examined. No particular evidence is apparent which should deflect general practice from its present opportunistic approach to screening, and the already established national screening programmes.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychological costs of screening.BMJ, 1989
- Can health screening damage your health?1989
- Is routine urine testing in outpatient clinics useful?BMJ, 1988
- Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner intervention in patients with excessive alcohol consumption.BMJ, 1988
- Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: comparison of attenders and non-attenders.1988
- DID THE NORTH KARELIA PROJECT REDUCE CORONARY MORTALITY?The Lancet, 1987
- Promoting prevention in primary care: controlled trial of low technology, low cost approach.BMJ, 1987
- SERUM CHOLESTEROL, BLOOD PRESSURE, AND MORTALITY: IMPLICATIONS FROM A COHORT OF 361 662 MENThe Lancet, 1986
- Culture, Illness, and CareAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1978
- LEAD TIME IN BREAST CANCER DETECTION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PERIODICITY OF SCREENING1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1974