The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 113 (5) , 2861-2873
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1561900
Abstract
The differences in spectral shape resolution abilities among cochlear implant (CI) listeners, and between CI and normal-hearing (NH) listeners, when listening with the same number of channels (12), was investigated. In addition, the effect of the number of channels on spectral shape resolution was examined. The stimuli were rippled noise signals with various ripple frequency-spacings. An adaptive 4IFC procedure was used to determine the threshold for resolvable ripple spacing, which was the spacing at which an interchange in peak and valley positions could be discriminated. The results showed poorer spectral shape resolution in CI compared to NH listeners (average thresholds of approximately 3000 and 400 Hz, respectively), and wide variability among CI listeners (range of approximately 800 to 8000 Hz). There was a significant relationship between spectral shape resolution and vowel recognition. The spectral shape resolution thresholds of NH listeners increased as the number of channels increased from 1 to 16, while the CI listeners showed a performance plateau at 4–6 channels, which is consistent with previous results using speech recognition measures. These results indicate that this test may provide a measure of CI performance which is time efficient and non-linguistic, and therefore, if verified, may provide a useful contribution to the prediction of speech perception in adults and children who use CIs.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategiesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2000
- The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6–20 channelsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998
- The Identification of Consonants and Vowels by Cochlear Implant Patients Using a 6-Channel Continuous Interleaved Sampling Processor and by Normal-Hearing Subjects Using Simulations of Processors with Two to Nine ChannelsEar & Hearing, 1998
- Speech Recognition as a Function of the Number of Electrodes Used in the SPEAK Cochlear Implant Speech ProcessorJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1997
- Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997
- Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjectsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997
- Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear ImplantsAudiology and Neurotology, 1996
- An international comparison of long-term average speech spectraThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994
- Factors Predicting Postoperative Sentence Scores in Postlinguistically Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant PatientsAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1992
- Longitudinal Changes in Word Recognition by Patients Who Use the Ineraid Cochlear ImplantEar & Hearing, 1990