Randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews: a foundation for evidence-based perinatal medicine
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Paediatrica
- Vol. 85 (6) , 647-655
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14116.x
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to introduce the reader to clinical research methodologies and to illustrate how randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews provide a solid foundation for evidence-based perinatal practice. Relevant references were critically appraised for validity and usefulness. Random allocation is of utmost importance to avoid bias. There are thousands of reported perinatal RCTs. Systematic review techniques allow clinicians to assess the effectiveness of perinatal interventions. The application of the results of systematic reviews to perinatal practice is increasing. RCTs and systematic reviews provide the most valid results on which to build an evidence-based perinatal practice. A major challenge for perinatal researchers is the development of innovative means of communication. This assures that the evidence for an effective intervention is timely implemented. Consumers of care should be encouraged to actively participate in the design, execution and dissemination of perinatal research.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of Ureaplasma urealyticum colonization with chronic lung disease of prematurity: Results of a metaanalysisThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical careJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Scientific knowledge and social consensusControlled Clinical Trials, 1994
- Low-dose indomethacin therapy and extension of intraventricular hemorrhage: A multicenter randomized trialThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1994
- Inborn/outborn status and neonatal survival: A meta‐analysis of non‐randomized studiesStatistics in Medicine, 1988
- An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- An evaluation of the quality of therapeutic studies in perinatal medicineThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1983
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981