Plagiarism and ideology: Identity in intercultural discourse
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Language in Society
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1-28
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500018388
Abstract
The concept of plagiarism, as used both in considerations of academic writing and in international negotiations over intellectual copyright, assumes a model of communication based on autonomous, rational, individuals who behave as originators of their own discourses. But studies of communication, beginning with Goffman's concepts of production format and footing – and also including the concepts of enactment, social role, face, politeness pragmatics, metaphors of self and communication, and innatist/social concepts of knowledge – indicate that such a unified, autonomous, and original communicative identity presupposes an oversimplified model of communication, centrally based in the ideology of the rational, autonomous individual which has been dominant in Europe since the Enlightenment. The concept of plagiarism masks the assertion of this ideological position. (Plagiarism, ideology, identity, intercultural discourse)Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond Bakhtin or the dialogic imagination in academiaPragmatics, 2022
- As a matter of fact: The changing ideology of authorship and responsibility in discourseWorld Englishes, 1994
- Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review, 1991
- Anorexia: The Cheating DisorderCollege English, 1990
- The Quick Fix: Curing Plagiarism with a Note-Taking ExerciseCollege Teaching, 1989
- Talking CulturePublished by University of Pennsylvania Press ,1988
- A Fragment on GovernmentPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1988
- The Pragmatics of Cross-Cultural Communication1Applied Linguistics, 1984
- THE CHINESE CONCEPTS OF “FACE”American Anthropologist, 1944