The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge
Top Cited Papers
- 18 May 2007
- journal article
- other
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 316 (5827) , 1036-1039
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
Abstract
We have used 19.9 million papers over 5 decades and 2.1 million patents to demonstrate that teams increasingly dominate solo authors in the production of knowledge. Research is increasingly done in teams across nearly all fields. Teams typically produce more frequently cited research than individuals do, and this advantage has been increasing over time. Teams now also produce the exceptionally high-impact research, even where that distinction was once the domain of solo authors. These results are detailed for sciences and engineering, social sciences, arts and humanities, and patents, suggesting that the process of knowledge creation has fundamentally changed.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner CitationsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2006
- Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contributionJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005
- Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team PerformanceScience, 2005
- Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999Research Policy, 2005
- A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophyJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003
- Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001
- Multiple AuthorshipJAMA, 1998
- The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and KnowledgeThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992
- A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of InnovationsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1990
- The Matthew Effect in ScienceScience, 1968