Norms for the Spiritual Weil-Being Scale
Open Access
- 1 March 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Psychology and Theology
- Vol. 19 (1) , 56-70
- https://doi.org/10.1177/009164719101900106
Abstract
As part of the growing interest in quality of life and subjective well-being, the Spiritual Well-Being Scale was constructed to measure the spiritual dimension. Research has shown good reliability for the scale and has provided encouraging support for its validity. It indicates well-being in a variety of spheres, including physical and mental health, psychological adjustment, and assertiveness. However, no norms have been published and little descriptive data have been readily available for the scale. Test-retest and internal consistency reliability coefficients and descriptive data are presented for several religious, student, and client groups. In evangelical samples the typical individual gets the maximum score; thus, the scale is not useful in distinguishing among individuals for purposes such as selection of spiritual leaders. The scale is currently useful for research and as a global index of lack of well-being.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Evaluation of the Research and Clinical Usefulness of the Spiritual Weil-Being ScaleJournal of Psychology and Theology, 1991
- Hope and its Relationship to Spiritual Well-BeingJournal of Psychology and Theology, 1988
- Psychology of ReligionAnnual Review of Psychology, 1988
- Psychological and spiritual well‐being in college studentsResearch in Nursing & Health, 1987
- Subjective well-being.Psychological Bulletin, 1984
- Spiritual Well-Being: Conceptualization and MeasurementJournal of Psychology and Theology, 1983
- The Development of Social Indicators for Quality of Life ResearchSociological Analysis, 1979
- Life Satisfaction and Religion: A ReanalysisSocial Forces, 1978
- Spiritual well-being: A neglected subject in quality of life researchSocial Indicators Research, 1978
- Subjective measures of well-being.American Psychologist, 1976