Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement
- 1 July 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 94 (1) , 20-33
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5223(19)36314-7
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative study of primary tissue valve failure between lonescu-shiley pericardial and Hancock porcine valves in the aortic positionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- Actuarial Analysis of the Risk of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis in 1,598 Patients With Mechanical and Bioprosthetic ValvesArchives of Surgery, 1985
- Detection of deterioration or infection of homograft and porcine xenograft bioprosthetic valves in mitral and aortic positions by two-dimensional echocardiographic examinationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983
- Nine Years' Experience with the Björk-Shiley Prosthetic Valve: Early and Late Results of 932 Valve ReplacementsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1983
- Surgical Treatment of Prosthetic Valve EndocarditisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1983
- Experience with the Carpentier-Edwards Porcine Valve Prosthesis in 700 PatientsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1982
- The Ultimate Prognosis after Valve Replacement: An Assessment at Twenty YearsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1981
- Five to Eight-Year Follow-up of Patients Undergoing Porcine Heart-Valve ReplacementNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Structural changes in porcine xenografts used as substitute cardiac valves: Gross and histologic observations in 51 glutaraldehyde-preserved Hancock valves in 41 patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977
- A generalized Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing K samples subject to unequal patterns of censorshipBiometrika, 1970