Conflict of Interest and the Credibility of Underwriter Analyst Recommendations
- 2 July 1999
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 12 (4) , 653-686
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/12.4.653
Abstract
Brokerage analysts frequently comment on and sometimes recommend companies that their firms have recently taken public. We show that stocks that underwriter analysts recommend perform more poorly than 'buy' recommendations by unaffiliated brokers prior to, at the time of, and subsequent to the recommendation date. We conclude that the recommendations by underwriter analysts show significant evidence of bias. We show also that the market does not recognize the full extent of this bias. The results suggest a potential conflict of interest inherent in the different functions that investment bankers perform.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Event study methodologies and the size effect: The case of UK press recommendationsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- When the Underwriter Is the Market Maker: An Examination of Trading in the IPO AftermarketThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- Why Do Firms Switch Underwriters?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
- Caveat Compounder: A Warning about Using the Daily CRSP Equal‐Weighted Index to Compute Long‐Run Excess ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1998
- The Effect of Investment Banking Relationships on Financial Analysts' Earnings Forecasts and Investment Recommendations*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1995
- THE MARKET'S PROBLEMS WITH THE PRICING OF INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGSJournal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1994
- Reputation and Performance Among Security AnalystsThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Wall StreetTeaching Sociology, 1991
- Discrete Expectational Data and Portfolio PerformanceThe Journal of Finance, 1986
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980