Understanding Global War
- 1 September 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 29 (3) , 391-417
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002785029003002
Abstract
While the problem of war in general deserves continuing scholarly attention, it seems appropriate to single out the systemwide—that is, global—war for intensive analysis as the kind of war that poses the gravest threat of catastrophe. Such a war can best be understood as an integral part of a long cycle, a recurring pattern in the development and operation of the global layer of the international system. From this perspective the design of a solution to the problem of global war requires either disruption of the long cycle or the development of a functional substitute for the leadership selection process that these wars have provided for the global system. The dominant contemporary solution to the problem, nuclear deterrence, ignores this perspective, and thereby overestimates the long-term utility and viability of deterrence. Deterrence theory also fails to provide a satisfactory explanation as to why and how deterrence works. Thus we must search for a creative alternative; and while its exact nature cannot be described, some relevant lines of inquiry can be identified.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Arms and InfluencePublished by JSTOR ,2020
- Terror without DeterrenceJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1984
- Global Wars, Public Debts, and the Long CycleWorld Politics, 1983
- War, Inflation, and the Kondratieff Long WaveJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1982
- Armaments and Escalation: Two Competing HypothesesInternational Studies Quarterly, 1982
- War and Change in World PoliticsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1981
- Victory Is PossibleForeign Policy, 1980
- The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-StateComparative Studies in Society and History, 1978
- Can Nuclear Deterrence Last out the Century?Foreign Affairs, 1973