After the Break-up
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Comparative Political Studies
- Vol. 33 (5) , 563-592
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414000033005001
Abstract
This article integrates historical and rational choice approaches to institutional origin and change to explain the establishment of electoral systems in three former Soviet Central Asian republics—Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. It argues that institutions designed under transitional circumstances are products of the interaction between the preceding historical and institutional setting and the dynamic uncertainty that surrounds them. Strategic actors engaged in the process of institutional design use both contexts in order to assess the degree to and direction in which their relative power is changing. They then negotiate accordingly so as to attain their preferred institutional outcomes. Central Asia's electoral systems in particular can be best understood as the product of very similar and long-standing regional power struggles being played out under varying dynamic and uncertain conditions.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should Transitologists Be Grounded?Slavic Review, 1995
- The Polish games of transitionCommunist and Post-Communist Studies, 1994
- The Logic of Institutional Preferences: German Electoral Law as a Social Choice OutcomeAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1993
- Institutions and Social ConflictPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1992
- Electoral Systems and Institutional ChoiceComparative Political Studies, 1992
- Transitions by Agreement: Modeling the Spanish WayAmerican Political Science Review, 1991
- Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto FrontierWorld Politics, 1991
- Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin AmericaComparative Politics, 1990
- Contra Contractarianism: Some Reflections on the New InstitutionalismPolitics & Society, 1988
- SovereigntyComparative Political Studies, 1988