A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 7 (9) , 1333-1340
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1989.7.9.1333
Abstract
Etoposide is an increasingly used and well-tolerated drug in cancer medicine. Its cytotoxic action is phase-specific and it has demonstrated schedule dependency in both in vitro and animal studies, but clinical evidence of the importance of drug scheduling is uncertain. The two administration schedules of etoposide that have been compared in this randomized study of 39 patients with previously untreated extensive small-cell lung cancer treated with single-agent etoposide were 500 mg/m2 as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion over 24 hours or five consecutive daily 2-hour infusions each of 100 mg/m2. Both regimens were repeated every 3 weeks, for a maximum of six cycles. Patients received combination chemotherapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) or radiotherapy on failure to respond or at relapse, depending on their Karnofsky performance status. The same therapy was used in both arms of the study. All patients are evaluable for response to etoposide. In the 24-hour arm, two patients achieved a partial remission, resulting in an overall response rate of 10%. In the 5-day schedule, 16 patients had a partial response and one had a complete remission, producing an overall response rate of 89%, which was significantly superior to that in the 24-hour arm (P < .001). The median duration of remission to etoposide in the 5-day arm was 4.5 months. Bone marrow toxicity was similar in both schedules. Etoposide pharmacokinetics were measured in all patients, and total areas under the concentration versus time curves (AUCs) were equivalent in both regimens. This study has clearly demonstrated the importance of etoposide scheduling in humans, and the superiority of five daily infusions over a 24-hour continuous infusion. The response rate to single-agent etoposide using an efficacious schedule in extensive small-cell lung cancer has been determined to be in excess of 80%.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Teniposide (VM-26), an overlooked highly active agent in small-cell lung cancer. Results of a phase II trial in untreated patients.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1986
- Variable bioavailability following repeated oral doses of etoposideEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1985
- The effect of food and concurrent chemotherapy on the bioavailability of oral etoposideBritish Journal of Cancer, 1985
- High-dose VP-16-213 and autologous bone marrow transplantation for refractory malignancies: a phase I study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1983
- EFFECTS OF THE EPIPODOPHYLLOTOXIN VP-16-213 ON CELL-CYCLE TRAVERSE, DNA-SYNTHESIS, AND DNA STRAND SIZE IN CULTURES OF HUMAN-LEUKEMIC LYMPHOBLASTS1983
- In vitro cytotoxicity of VP 16 on primary tumor and metastasis of Lewis lung carcinomaEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1982
- Cell cycle stage-dependent induction of G2 phase arrest by different antitumor agentsPublished by Elsevier ,1978
- VP-16-213 MONOTHERAPY FOR REMISSION INDUCTION OF SMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER - RANDOMIZED TRIAL USING 3 DOSAGE SCHEDULES1978
- VM 26 and VP 16–213: A comparative analysisCancer, 1977
- SURVIVAL AND CYCLE-PROGRESSION DELAY OF HUMAN LYMPHOMA-CELLS INVITRO EXPOSED TO VP-16-2131976