Long-Term Outcome After Operative Intervention for Rectal Cancer in Patients Aged Over 80 Years: Analysis of 9,501 Patients
- 1 May 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 50 (5) , 604-610
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0802-0
Abstract
Perceptions of poor outcome may detract caregivers from offering standard therapies to patients over 80 years who have been diagnosed with rectal cancer. We evaluate the effect of operative intervention on their survival. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival for patients over 80 years with rectal and rectosigmoid cancer from 1993 to 2002 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute were examined. Survival was determined by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients who underwent operation (Group A) were compared with those who did not undergo surgery (Group B). Fisher's exact, chi-squared, analysis of variance, and log-rank tests were used as appropriate, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 9,501 patients (19 percent) were aged older than 80 years. Mean age was 85 years, and median survival was 24 months. Stage of disease was unknown for 2,915 patients. Median survival was 58, 53, 39, 27, and 5 months for Stages 0 (n=163), I (n=1,878), II (n=1,796), III (n=1,536), and IV (n=1,213), respectively. A total of 6,900 patients (81 percent) underwent surgery. Median survival for operated patients was significantly longer for all stages (36 vs. 5 months, P < 0.00001), Stage 0 (60 vs. 7 months, P < 0.01), Stage I (55 vs. 11 months, P < 0.0001), Stage II (41 vs. 13 months, P < 0.0001), Stage III (28 vs. 14 months, P < 0.05), and Stage IV (8 vs. 3 months, P < 0.0001). For patients with rectal cancer, local therapy also significantly improved median survival compared with nonoperated patients (P < 0.0001). Operative intervention provides sustained benefit in terms of survival to patients aged >80 years with rectal cancer at all stages who are assessed to be a good operative risk. Age older than 80 years should not detract surgeons from offering optimal therapy to good-risk patients.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rectal cancer surgery in patients more than 80 years of ageThe American Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Favorable short-term and long-term outcome after elective radical rectal cancer resection in patients 75 years of age or olderDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2000
- Association between age and local recurrence of rectal cancer: results from a retrospective study of 902 patientsInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1997
- Colorectal cancer in patients over 75 years of age—determinants of outcomeEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1997
- The outcome of surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly: a 12-year review from the Trafford databaseEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1995
- Prognosis of elderly patients with large bowel cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1994
- Cancer Treatment and Age: Patient PerspectivesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Elective versus emergency surgery for patients with colorectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1992
- Time to loco-regional recurrence after resection of Dukes' B and C colorectal cancer with or without adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy. A multivariate regression analysisBritish Journal of Cancer, 1992
- Prognosis of colorectal cancer in the elderlyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988