Corporate Governance and Acquirer Returns
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 14 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 62 (4) , 1851-1889
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01259.x
Abstract
We examine whether corporate governance mechanisms, especially the market for corporate control, affect the profitability of firm acquisitions. We find that acquirers with more antitakeover provisions experience significantly lower announcement‐period abnormal stock returns. This supports the hypothesis that managers at firms protected by more antitakeover provisions are less subject to the disciplinary power of the market for corporate control and thus are more likely to indulge in empire‐building acquisitions that destroy shareholder value. We also find that acquirers operating in more competitive industries or separating the positions of CEO and chairman of the board experience higher abnormal announcement returns.Keywords
This publication has 79 references indexed in Scilit:
- The costs of entrenched boardsJournal of Financial Economics, 2005
- What Matters in Corporate Governance?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- Firms’ Decisions Where to IncorporateThe Journal of Law and Economics, 2003
- The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Theory, Evidence, and PolicyStanford Law Review, 2002
- Control Rights, Priority Rights, and the Conceptual Foundations of Corporate ReorganizationsVirginia Law Review, 2001
- New Evidence and Perspectives on MergersJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2001
- Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statisticsJournal of Financial Economics, 1997
- Corporate Control and the Choice of Investment Financing: The Case of Corporate AcquisitionsThe Journal of Finance, 1990
- The gains to bidding firms from mergerJournal of Financial Economics, 1983
- Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate MergersThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1981