Undiversion: When and How?
- 1 March 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 115 (3) , 296-298
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)59178-8
Abstract
The reason for the permanant diversion in the first place should be ascertained and that decision critically reevaluated. A careful estimation of renal function and renal reserve is of primary importance. Unless renal function is nearly normal in the child, serious consideration of undiversion is deferred until nearly full growth is achieved or until a clear record of improvement in renal function, despite increasing body mass, is established. When possible it is preferrable to reconstitute the urinary tract without using bowel segments, avoiding the attendant problems of mucous formation and electrolyte reabsorption.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management of Extensively Destroyed Ureter: Special Reference to Renal AutotransplantationJournal of Urology, 1976
- Urinary Tract Refunctionalization After Prior Diversion in ChildrenAnnals of Surgery, 1974
- Secondary Urinary Reconstruction: Use of the Ileocecal SegmentJournal of Urology, 1974
- Reconstruction of previously diverted urinary tracts in childrenJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 1973
- Urinary Tract Reconstruction following Ileal Conduit DiversionJournal of Urology, 1973
- Posterior Urethral Valves: A Study of Urinary Control after OperationJournal of Urology, 1972
- Renal Transplantation in Children with Corrected Abnormalities of the Lower Urinary TractJournal of Urology, 1971
- Experiments with Intussuscepted Ileal Valve in Ureteral SubstitutionJournal of Urology, 1959