STIMULUS CONTROL OF AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR1
- 1 March 1964
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 7 (2) , 129-133
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1964.7-129
Abstract
The introduction of a warning signal preceding shocks greatly increased the effectiveness of avoidance responding. Periods of “warm-up” at the beginning of the session were eliminated, and the number of shocks received by the subjects was greatly reduced. With response-shock interval constant, response rate increased as the interval between the response and the onset of the warning signal was shortened. The response tended to occur shortly after the onset of the warning signal regardless of the duration of these “safe” periods. A greatly elevated response rate was maintained even when the duration of the safe period was reduced to 0.3 sec. Thus, the pre-shock signal obtained nearly exclusive control of the responding and overrode the usual “temporal discrimination” of the response-shock interval.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- FIXED‐RATIO ESCAPE REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963
- GENERAL ACTIVITY AS INSTRUMENTAL: APPLICATION TO AVOIDANCE TRAINING1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963
- QUANTITATIVE RELATIONS BETWEEN AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR AND PITUITARY‐ADRENAL CORTICAL ACTIVITY1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962
- DISCRIMINATED BAR‐PRESS AVOIDANCE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961
- SOME NOTES ON “BURSTS” IN FREE‐OPERANT AVOIDANCE EXPERIMENTSJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1958
- A comparison of two types of warning stimulus in an avoidance situation.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1957
- Some properties of the warning stimulus in avoidance behavior.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1955
- Avoidance Conditioning with Brief Shock and No Exteroceptive Warning SignalScience, 1953