Comparing Mortality Rates on Capd/Ccpd and Hemodialysis the Canadian Experience: Fact or Fiction?
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Peritoneal Dialysis International
- Vol. 18 (5) , 478-484
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089686089801800504
Abstract
← Objective: To compare mortality rates on hemodialysis (HD) to rates on continuous ambulatory/cyclic peritoneal dialysis (CAPD/CCPD), to contrast our results with those of other recent investigations, and to discuss reasons for discrepancies. ← Data Sources: Patient -specific data obtained from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register on patients initiating renal replacement therapy (RRT) between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 1995 (n = 14483). Recent mortality comparisons of CAPD and HD. ← Main Outcome Measures: Mortality rate ratio (RR) based on “as-treated” (AT) analysis incorporating treatment modality switches and adjusting for age, primary renal diagnosis, and comorbid conditions using Poisson regression. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox regression and based on an “intent-to-treat” (ITT) analysis wherein patients were classified based on dialytic modality received on follow-up day 90. ← Results: Adjusted mortality rates were significantly decreased on CAPD/CCPD relative to HD [RR = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.69, 0.77)] based on the AT analysis. Most of the protective effect of CAPD/CCPD was concentrated in the first 2 years of follow-up post-RRT initiation. Based on the ITT analysis, the estimated CAPD/ CCPD effect was greatly reduced, with HR = 0.93 (0.87, 0.99). ← Conclusions: We provide further evidence that CAPD/ CCPD is not an inferior dialytic modality to HD, particularly in the short term. Comparing mortality rates on CAPD/ CCPD and HD is inherently difficult due to the potential for bias. Discrepancies between our results and those of previous investigations, and variability in findings among previous studies, relate to differences in clinical and demographic setting, patient populations, study design, statistical methods, and interaction between the dialytic modality effect and various other covariables.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: A comparison of adjusted mortality ratesAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1997
- Lower probability of patient survival with continuous peritoneal dialysis in the United States compared with Canada. Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 1997
- Logical and statistical fallacies in the use of cox regression modelsAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1996
- 1983 to 1992: Report on regular dialysis and transplantation in LombardyAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1995
- Demography and survival of patients receiving treatment for chronic renal failure in Australia and New Zealand: report on dialysis and renal transplantation treatment from the Australia and New Zealand dialysis and transplant registryAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1995
- Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Comparison of patient mortality with adjustment for comorbid conditionsKidney International, 1994
- Comparison of Survival in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Hospital Haemodialysis: A Multicentric StudyNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 1991
- A Comparison of Survival Among Dialytic Therapies of Choice: In-Center Hemodialysis Versus Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis at HomeAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1990
- A six-year comparison of patient and technique survivals in CAPD and HDKidney International, 1988
- SELECTION-ADJUSTED COMPARISON OF LIFE-EXPECTANCY OF PATIENTS ON CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, HAEMODIALYSIS, AND RENAL TRANSPLANTATIONThe Lancet, 1987