Indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg bid and efavirenz 600 mg qd in patients failing treatment with combination nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors: 96‐week outcomes of HIV‐NAT 009
- 28 October 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in HIV Medicine
- Vol. 6 (6) , 410-420
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1293.2005.00327.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NRTI) sparing is a favourable option for patients with NRTI failure or toxicity. METHODS: Patients judged to be failing NRTI therapy were enrolled in a single-arm, open-label study of indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/r) 800/100 mg twice a day (bid)+efavirenz (EFV) 600 mg once a day (qd). The primary endpoint was the change in time-weighted average HIV RNA from baseline. The initial 48-week protocol was extended to 96 weeks by a single amendment. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (23 female) were enrolled in the study. Baseline median inter-quartile range (IQR) NRTI exposure was 4.4 (3.9-4.7) years; baseline median viral load was 4.09 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (range 3.75-4.61 log(10) copies/mL); baseline median CD4 count was 169 cells/microL (range 60-277 cells/microL). The mean (SD) change in time-weighted average HIV RNA from baseline at 48 and 96 weeks was -2.1 (0.7) and -2.1 (0.8) log(10) copies/mL respectively, resulting in 87% and 69% of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL. Sixteen per cent of patients permanently ceased therapy and 26% underwent temporary drug interruptions because of study drug-related adverse events. Fasted-lipid values rose significantly over the 96 weeks of study, as did median blood glucose and median serum creatinine levels. Twelve (20%) patients underwent IDV dose reduction, mainly because of nephrotoxicity (nine of 12 patients). Blood pressure values deteriorated following switch, but markers of nucleoside toxicity improved. CONCLUSIONS: IDV/r 800/100 mg bid+EFV 600 mg qd gave a potent, durable response in these NRTI failures and was reasonably well tolerated. However, we observed adverse effects on renal, metabolic and blood pressure parameters. Lower doses of boosted IDV might improve toxicity while maintaining efficacy, and this possibility warrants further investigatioKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment for Adult HIV InfectionJAMA, 2004
- Saquinavir drug exposure is not impaired by the boosted double protease inhibitor combination of lopinavir/ritonavirAIDS, 2004
- Combination Antiretroviral Therapy and the Risk of Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Lopinavir/ritonavir plus saquinavir in salvage therapy; pharmacokinetics, tolerability and efficacyAIDS, 2003
- Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of indinavir with or without low-dose ritonavir in HIV-infected Thai patientsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2003
- A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Trial of Zidovudine Plus Lamivudine Versus Zidovudine Plus Lamivudine Plus Didanosine in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-1–Infected Thai PatientsJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2001
- Therapy with Efavirenz plus Indinavir in Patients with Extensive Prior Nucleoside Reverse‐Transcriptase Inhibitor Experience: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled TrialThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2001
- A randomized, dose-finding study with didanosine plus stavudine versus didanosine alone in antiviral-naive, HIV-infected Thai patientsAIDS, 2000
- Lipids, lipoproteins, triglyceride clearance, and cytokines in human immunodeficiency virus infection and the acquired immunodeficiency syndromeJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1992
- Blood pressure and high blood pressure. Aspects of risk.Hypertension, 1991