Failure of soluble fibrin polymers in the diagnosis of clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis
- Vol. 10 (5) , 245-250
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00001721-199907000-00005
Abstract
A new diagnostic test has recently become available which is highly specific for plasma soluble fibrin polymers, the thrombus precursor protein (TpP™) enzyme immunoassay. In order to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of this test and that of a new rapid and automated test for the determination of D-dimers, the BC D-dimer test, in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), 70 consecutive symptomatic patients underwent laboratory analysis with both tests and with the classic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) D-dimer test, followed by the execution of a compression ultrasound (CUS) test of the affected limb. Patients with a positive CUS test were considered to have DVT (20 of 70), whereas those with a serially negative test and an uneventful 3-month follow-up test were regarded as not having DVT (50 of 70). The sensitivity of the TpP™ test (45.0%) was significantly lower than that of both the BC D-dimer test (80.0%; P = 0.02) and the classic ELISA test (90.0%; P = 0.002). The specificity of the TpP™ test (66.0%) did not differ from that of either D-dimer test (60.0 and 64.0%, respectively). The negative predictive value of the TpP™ test (75.0%) was significantly lower than that of the classic ELISA D-dimer test (94.1%; P = 0.02), which in turn did not differ from that of the BC D-dimer test (88.2%). The positive predictive value was similarly low for each investigated test (34.6, 44.4, and 50.0%, respectively). In conclusion, the TpP™ test can neither be used to detect a DVT nor to exclude its development in patients with the clinical suspicion of this disease. By contrast, the BC D-dimer might safely replace the classic ELISA test for excluding DVT in symptomatic patients.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: