Aspects of misclassification of confounding factors
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Industrial Medicine
- Vol. 21 (1) , 107-112
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700210113
Abstract
Misclassification of exposure in epidemiologic investigations has been extensively studied and is now well understood. In contrast, misclassification of confounding factors has been much less investigated. First, we consider a situation with confounding by age, in which misclassification is introduced through stratification of this inherently continuous variable. This misclassification turns out to be benign: 75% of the original confounding is removed by stratification into two age classes and more than 90% by using three age classes. Second, we consider a situation with serious confounding and serious misclassification of the confounding factor but no misclassification of the exposure. In this situation, the misclassification turns out to be of importance. After stratification for the misclassified confounding factor, it appears as though the exposure has a stronger effect on the incidence than the confounder, which is the reverse of the true situation.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- ESTIMATING AND CORRECTING FOR CONFOUNDER MISCLASSIFICATIONAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1989
- MISCLASSIFIED CONFOUNDERSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- CONFOUNDING AND MISCLASSIFICATIONAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- EFFEC OF THE USE OF UNRELIABLE SURROGATE VARIABLES ON THE VALIDITY OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH STUDIESAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1984
- Methodological Issues in Case-Control Studies III:—The Effect of Joint Misclassification of Risk Factors and Confounding Factors upon Estimation and PowerInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1984
- THE EFFECT OF MISCLASSIFICATION IN THE PRESENCE OF COVARIATESAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1980