Environmental Control of Flowering in Barley (Hordeum vulgare). III. Analysis of Potential Vernalization Responses, and Methods of Screening Germplasm for Sensitivity to Photoperiod and Temperature
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Annals of Botany
- Vol. 63 (6) , 687-704
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087797
Abstract
Three genotypes of barley were subjected to 18 potentially vernalizing pre-treatments, comprising constant temperatures of 1, 5 or 9 °C in factorial combination with photoperiods of 8 or 16 h d−1 for 10, 30 or 60 d−1. These pre-treated seeds or seedlings, together with non-pre-treated seeds as controls, were then transferred to each of four growing-on regimes, namely day/night temperatures of 18/5 °C or 24/3 °C in factorial combination with photoperiods of 11 or 16 h d−1. The times from sowing to awn emergence were recorded. The warmer growing-on regime (mean 19 °C) was not supra-optimal in long days, but in short days it considerably delayed awn emergence in all three genotypes. In cv. Athenais there was no specific response to the potentially vernalizing pre-trcatments: the rate of progress towards awn emergence could be treated as a linear function of the integrated responses to temperature and photoperiod acting independently throughout development. In addition to these responses, cv. Gerbel B and the land-race Arabi Abiad also responded to low-temperature vernalization and the response became saturated during the longer-duration pre-treatments. In Arabi Abiad, the rate at which vernalization occurred, and the period required to saturate the response, were not greatly influenced by difference in pre-treatment temperature between 1 and 9 °C. In contrast, in Gerbel B the cooler the temperature of pre-treatment the greater the saturated response to vernalization, the greater the effect of each day of pre-treatment, and the shorter the period required to saturate the response. Models of the photothennal and vernalization responses were combined in a single entity which described the influence of environment on rate of development. Simple germplasm-screening techniques are proposed for genotype characterization so that the phenotypic flowering response can be estimated for any environmentKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relationships between time, temperature, daylength and development in spring barleyThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1987
- MEASUREMENT AND PREDICTION OF FLOWERING IN ANNUAL CROPSPublished by Elsevier ,1987
- Improving Water use Efficiency of Annual Crops in the Rainfed Farming Systems of West Asia and North AfricaExperimental Agriculture, 1987
- The effects of several husbandry factors on the growth and yield of winter-sown barley at four sites in each of three yearsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1984
- A Comparison of Different Vernalization Techniques in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Journal of Plant Physiology, 1984
- Effects of Temperature and Photoperiod on Flowering in Soya bean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]: a Quantitative ModelAnnals of Botany, 1984
- A Quantitative Model of Reproductive Development in Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.] in relation to Photoperiod and Temperature, and Implications for Screening GermplasmAnnals of Botany, 1983
- Effect of temperature on the development of two annual medicsAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1979
- Effects of Day Length and Light Intensity on Growth of Barley IV. Genetically Controlled Variation in Response to PhotoperiodAustralian Journal of Biological Sciences, 1966
- Effect of Photoperiod and Temperature on Development of BarleyBotanical Gazette, 1941