Parent Effectiveness Training: A Review
- 1 August 1977
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 41 (1) , 95-109
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1977.41.1.95
Abstract
Parent Effectiveness Training (PET) has become a popular approach for educating parents in child-rearing practices. PET is based, in part, upon the teachings of Carl Rogers and trains parents in listening techniques, communication skills, and child-parent problem solving. This paper summarizes and critically evaluates the research literature regarding the effects of PET on parents and their children. The existing research was judged by the authors as limited in scope and inadequate in design. Specifically problems regarding random assignment of subjects to groups, a relative lack of objective behavioral measures, inappropriate statistical methods, absent or inappropriate control conditions, and a lack of follow ups typify the research. Over-all, the effectiveness of PET as a prevention or intervention strategy was not supported.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Training parents of behaviorally-disordered children in groups: A three years' program evaluationBehavior Therapy, 1975
- Clinical Applications of Biofeedback TrainingArchives of General Psychiatry, 1974
- Basic models of parent counseling: A critical review.Psychological Bulletin, 1974
- Training parents in behavior modification: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 1974
- USING PARENTS AS CHANGE AGENTS FOR THEIR CHILDREN: A REVIEWJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1973
- Children's Reports of Parental Behavior: An InventoryChild Development, 1965
- Achievement motivation training for underachieving high-school boys.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965
- Dimensions of therapist response as causal factors in therapeutic change.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1962
- The Children's Form of the Manifest Anxiety ScaleChild Development, 1956
- Traditional Family Ideology and Its Relation to Personality*Journal of Personality, 1955