Cost‐effectiveness of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C
Open Access
- 29 April 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 19 (11) , 1159-1172
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01963.x
Abstract
Background : Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients using abdominal ultrasonography and alpha-foetoprotein levels is widely practiced. Aim : To evaluate its cost-effectiveness using a Markov decision model. Methods : Several screening strategies with abdominal ultrasonography or computerized tomography and serum alpha-foetoprotein at 6–12-month intervals in 40-year-old patients with chronic hepatitis C and compensated cirrhosis were simulated from a societal perspective, resulting in discounted costs per quality-adjusted life-year saved. Extensive sensitivity analysis was performed. Results : For the least efficacious strategy, annual alpha-foetoprotein/ultrasonography, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (vs. no screening) was $23 043/quality-adjusted life-year. Biannual alpha-foetoprotein/annual ultrasonography, the most commonly used strategy in the United States, was more efficacious, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of $33 083/quality-adjusted life-year vs. annual alpha-foetoprotein/ultrasonography. The most efficacious strategy, biannual alpha-foetoprotein/ultrasonography, resulted in a cost-effectiveness ratio of $73 789/quality-adjusted life-year vs. biannual alpha-foetoprotein/annual ultrasonography. Biannual alpha-foetoprotein/annual computerized tomography screening resulted in a cost-effectiveness ratio of $51 750/quality-adjusted life-year vs. biannual alpha-foetoprotein/annual ultrasonography screening. Conclusions : Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma is as cost-effective as other accepted screening protocols. Of the strategies evaluated, biannual alpha-foetoprotein/annual ultrasonography gives the most quality-adjusted life-year gain while still maintaining a cost-effectiveness ratio <$50 000/quality-adjusted life-year. Biannual alpha-foetoprotein/annual computerized tomography screening may be cost-effective.Keywords
This publication has 78 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survivalHepatology, 2003
- Screening tests for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C: A systematic reviewHepatology, 2002
- Clinical Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL ConferenceJournal of Hepatology, 2001
- Assessment of Utilities and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Liver DiseaseAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2001
- No treatment, resection and ethanol injection in hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of survival in 391 patients with cirrhosisJournal of Hepatology, 1995
- Prospective study of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in Caucasian patients with cirrhosisJournal of Hepatology, 1994
- Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Child's A cirrhosis: an 8-year prospective study by ultrasound and alphafetoproteinJournal of Hepatology, 1994
- Risk factors for tumor recurrence and prognosis after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinomaCancer, 1993
- Detection of malignant tumors in end-stage cirrhotic livers: efficacy of sonography as a screening technique.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1992
- A randomized trial of hepatic arterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinomaJournal of Hepatology, 1990