Auditing Fair Value Measurements: A Synthesis of Relevant Research
- 1 September 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Accounting Association in Accounting Horizons
- Vol. 20 (3) , 287-303
- https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2006.20.3.287
Abstract
To contribute to the PCAOB project on auditing fair value measurements (FVMs), we synthesize relevant academic literature to offer insights, conclusions, and future research directions for auditors, standard-setters, and academics focusing on auditing FVMs. We structure our synthesis along two dimensions: (1) an emphasis on the auditor's need to understand how FVMs are prepared, and (2) the audit steps and procedures necessary to verify and attest to FVMs, including an awareness of the potential biases inherent in auditing FVMs. Drawing primarily from the judgment and decision-making literature, we highlight a number of potential biases and limitations in the preparation and audit of FVMs. Additionally, we note that the specialized valuation knowledge necessary to effectively audit FVMs will be difficult for auditors to gain and maintain.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Employee Stock Option Fair‐Value Estimates: Do Managerial Discretion and Incentives Explain Accuracy?*Contemporary Accounting Research, 2006
- Stock Option Expense, Forward-Looking Information, and Implied Volatilities of Traded OptionsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- The Effects of Computer Assurance Specialist Competence and Auditor AIS Expertise on Auditor Planning JudgmentsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- Managing Stock Option Expense: The Manipulation of Option-Pricing Model AssumptionsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Biased predecision processing.Psychological Bulletin, 2003
- Instrumental Bias in Motivated Reasoning: More When More Is NeededOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997
- Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992
- Influences on the appropriateness of confidence in judgment: Practice, effort, information, and decision-makingOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991
- Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.Psychological Review, 1987
- Clinical Judgment and ComputersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980