Pegylated interferons for chronic hepatitis C virus infection: an indirect analysis of randomized trials
- 8 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Viral Hepatitis
- Vol. 15 (8) , 551-570
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.00984.x
Abstract
Summary. Dual therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection who meet criteria for treatment, but it is unclear whether pegylated interferon alfa‐2a or pegylated interferon alfa‐2b is more effective or associated with fewer adverse events. Because data from head‐to‐head trials of pegylated interferon regimens are sparse, we performed adjusted indirect analysis using trials comparing dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa‐2a or pegylated interferon alfa‐2bvsdual therapy with non‐pegylated interferon. We searched for potentially relevant randomized controlled trials using electronic databases and reference lists. A total of 16 trials met inclusion criteria. Adjusted indirect comparisons found no statistically significant differences between dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa‐2a and dual therapy with pegylated interferon alfa‐2b on the outcomes sustained virologic response [relative risk (RR) = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.56–4.46], withdrawal due to adverse events (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.29–2.55), anaemia (RR = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.32–8.84), depression (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.41–2.90) or flu‐like symptoms (RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.53–2.29). Adjusting for potential publication bias and stratifying analyses by indicators of methodological quality, human immunodeficiency virus infection status, hepatitis C virus genotype, dose of ribavirin or dose of pegylated interferon did not change conclusions. There is insufficient evidence to support conclusions that dual therapy with one pegylated interferon is superior to the other. However, because estimates are imprecise, our results also do not rule out a clinically significant difference. Head‐to‐head trials are needed to verify the results of indirect analyses and provide additional guidance on optimal treatment choices.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomised trial to compare the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and antiviral effects of peginterferon alfa-2b and peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis C (COMPARE)Journal of Hepatology, 2006
- A randomized controlled trial of pegylated interferon α‐2a (40 KD) or interferon α‐2a plus ribavirin and amantadine vs interferon α‐2a and ribavirin in treatment‐naïve patients with chronic hepatitis CJournal of Viral Hepatitis, 2005
- Modifications of haematological series in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus during treatment with interferon and ribavirin: differences between pegylated and standard interferonClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2004
- Peginterferon α‐2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon α‐2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Saudi patients commonly infected with genotype 4Liver International, 2004
- Meta‐analysis: a randomized trial of peginterferon plus ribavirin for the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 4Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2004
- Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for naïve patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C: a randomized controlled trialJournal of Hepatology, 2004
- Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C†Hepatology, 2004
- Peginterferon vs. standard interferon in the treatment of chronic hepatitis CAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2003
- The burden of hepatitis C in the United StatesHepatology, 2002
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002