Examining Attitudes Toward Body Checking, Levels of Emotional Empathy, and Levels of Aggression in Body Checking and Non-Body Checking Youth Hockey Leagues
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
- Vol. 19 (3) , 207-215
- https://doi.org/10.1097/jsm.0b013e31819d658e
Abstract
Objectives: To determine if attitudes associated with body checking, emotional empathy, and aggression differ between players in body checking and non-body checking hockey leagues and to determine the influence of these attitudes on injury rates. Design: Prospective cohort. Setting: Participants were randomly recruited by team from the Calgary Minor Hockey Association at the beginning of the 2006-2007 season. Participants: There were 283 participants from Pee Wee (aged 11-12 vears), Bantam (aged 13-14 years), and Midget (aged 15-16 years) teams. Of 13 teams from the body checking league, 138 players participated, and of 24 teams in the non-body checking league, 145 players participated. Assessment of Risk Factors: Participants completed 4 self-report questionnaires: (1) Medical Questionnaire, (2) Body Checking Questionnaire, (3) Empathy Index for Children and Adolescents, and (4) Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Main Outcome Measures: Participants were followed through the season for injury reports. The injury definition included any hockey injury resulting in medical attention, the inability to complete a hockey session, and/or missing a subsequent hockey session. Results: Body checking players reported more positive attitudes toward body checking (35.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 34.52-36.65) than non-body checking players (22.43; 95%, CI, 21.38-23.49; t = -1 7.34 P < 0.00005). There was no significant difference in the empathy scores between cohorts (t = 1.51 P = 0.13). The mean aggression score for the body checking players (76.22; 95% CI 73.18-79.25) was significantly higher than the mean for the non-body checking players (70.57; 95% CI, 67.35-73.80; t = -2.52: P = 0.013). Conclusions: Body checking seems to influence attitudes toward body checking and aggression, but attitudes toward body checking, empathy, and aggression did not influence injury rates.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Examining the Familial Link Between Positive Affect and Empathy Development in the Second YearThe Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2007
- Associations Among Empathy, Social Competence, & Reactive/Proactive Aggression SubtypesJournal of Youth and Adolescence, 2006
- Empathy and Observed Anger and Aggression in Five‐Year‐OldsSocial Development, 2004
- RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMPATHY AND THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS IN A SAMPLE OF SPANISH ADOLESCENTSSocial Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 2004
- Trait aggressiveness and hockey penalties: Predicting hot tempers on the ice.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998
- Relations among personality scales of aggression, violence, and empathy: Validational evidence bearing on the risk of eruptive violence scaleAggressive Behavior, 1997
- Power, empathy, and moral conflict in sport.Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 1996
- Hockey Violence: A Test of Cultural Spillover TheorySociology of Sport Journal, 1996
- The Effects of Subjective and Objective Competitive Outcomes on Intrinsic MotivationJournal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1989
- A measure of emotional empathy1Journal of Personality, 1972