Did Unilateral Divorce Laws Raise Divorce Rates? A Reconciliation and New Results
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 96 (5) , 1802-1820
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1802
Abstract
Applying the Coase Theorem to marital bargaining suggests that shifting from consent to unilateral divorce laws will not affect divorce rates. I show that existing evidence suggesting large effects of divorce laws on divorce rates reflect a failure to explicitly model the dynamic response of divorce rates to a shock to the legal regime. When accounting for these dynamics, I find that unilateral divorce spiked following the adoption of unilateral divorce laws, but that this rise largely reversed itself within a decade. Overall, these changes in family law explain very little of the rise in divorce over the past half-century.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Divorce Laws and the Structure of the American FamilyThe Journal of Legal Studies, 2006
- Is Making Divorce Easier Bad for Children? The Long‐Run Implications of Unilateral DivorceJournal of Labor Economics, 2004
- How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004
- Marriage, divorce, and legal change: new evidence from England and WalesEconomic Inquiry, 2001
- Further Discussion of the Effects of No-Fault Divorce on Divorce RatesJournal of Marriage and Family, 1999
- The Numerical Reliability of Econometric SoftwareJournal of Economic Literature, 1999
- Dissolving the relationship between divorce laws and divorce ratesInternational Review of Law and Economics, 1998
- No-fault laws and at-fault peopleInternational Review of Law and Economics, 1998
- A Reconsideration of the Effect of No-Fault Divorce on Divorce RatesJournal of Marriage and Family, 1997
- The Effect of No-Fault Divorce Law on the Divorce Rate Across the 50 States and Its Relation to Income, Education, and ReligiosityJournal of Marriage and Family, 1995