A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL)/sirolimus in renal transplantation. Ii. Survival, function, and protocol compliance at 1 year
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 77 (2) , 252-258
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000101495.22734.07
Abstract
In an attempt to reduce chronic calcineurin inhibitor induced allograft nephropathy in first cadaver and human leukocyte antigen non-identical living-donor renal transplantation, sirolimus (Siro) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was tested as adjunctive therapy, with planned dose reductions of tacrolimus (Tacro) over the first year postoperatively. Adjunctive Siro therapy with a similar dose reduction algorithm for Neoral (Neo) was included for comparison. The detailed dose reduction plan (Tacro and Siro, group A; Tacro and MMF, group B; Neo and Siro, group C) is described in our companion report in this issue of Transplantation. The present report documents function, patient and graft survival, protocol compliance, and adverse events. As mentioned (in companion report), group demographics were similar. The present study shows no significant differences in 1-year patient and graft survival but does show a trend that points to more difficulties in group C by way of a rising slope of serum creatinine concentration (P =0.02) and decreasing creatinine clearance (P =0.04). There were more patients who discontinued the protocol plan in group C. Thus far, no posttransplant lymphomas have appeared, and infectious complications have not differed among the groups. However, a greater percentage of patients in group C were placed on antihyperlipidemia therapy, with an (unexpected) trend toward a higher incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus in this group. Group A required fewer, and group B the fewest, antihyperlipidemia therapeutic interventions (P Conclusions. This 1-year interim analysis of a long-term, prospective, randomized renal-transplant study indicates that decreasing maintenance dosage of Tacro with adjunctive Siro or MMF appears to point to improved long-term function, with reasonably few adverse events.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one yearTransplantation, 2004
- Late deterioration of organ transplants: a problem in injury and homeostasisCurrent Opinion in Immunology, 2002
- Daclizumab induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as an immunosuppression regimen for primary kidney transplant recipients1Transplantation, 2002
- SIROLIMUS ALLOWS EARLY CYCLOSPORINE WITHDRAWAL IN RENAL TRANSPLANTATION RESULTING IN IMPROVED RENAL FUNCTION AND LOWER BLOOD PRESSURE1,2,10Transplantation, 2001
- Mechanisms of chronic rejectionCurrent Opinion in Immunology, 2000
- REDUCTION OF ACUTE RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTION BY DACLIZUMAB1Transplantation, 1999
- Interleukin-2–Receptor Blockade with Daclizumab to Prevent Acute Rejection in Renal TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- A PHASE I TRIAL OF HUMANIZED ANTI-INTERLEUKIN 2 RECEPTOR ANTIBODY IN RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1Transplantation, 1997
- A Simple and Safe Method for Management of Lymphocele After Renal TransplantationJournal of Urology, 1983
- Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum CreatinineNephron, 1976