Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: an application to the Italian NEO personality inventory
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in European Journal of Personality
- Vol. 16 (1_suppl) , S43-S55
- https://doi.org/10.1002/per.449
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the evaluation of cluster analysis solutions. Internal criteria and replication issues are compared and applied to empirical data collected from an Italian sample of 421 young adults, using the NEO Personality Inventory. The following internal criteria were considered: C, gamma, and G( + ) indices, and point‐biserial correlation. Replication was examined (i) ‘internally’ using double cross‐validation and bootstrap approaches and (ii) ‘externally’ by comparing the solution obtained on the Italian sample with the results obtained in German and Spanish samples. While replication analyses supported three‐ and four‐cluster solutions, internal criteria (with the exception of point‐biserial correlation) tended to privilege solutions with a much larger number of groups. Advantages and limitations of the different strategies are discussed. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multivariate Methods for the Comparison of Factor Structures in Cross-Cultural ResearchJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2000
- Research news and Comment: AERA Editorial Policies Regarding Statistical Significance Testing: Three Suggested ReformsEducational Researcher, 1996
- The Pivotal Role of Replication in Psychological Research: Empirically Evaluating the Replicability of Sample ResultsJournal of Personality, 1994
- Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation ModelsSociological Methods & Research, 1992
- Book ReviewsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1990
- Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the JackknifeThe Annals of Statistics, 1979
- Validation of Discriminant Analysis in Marketing ResearchJournal of Marketing Research, 1977
- Measuring the Power of Hierarchical Cluster AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1975
- Methods of Comparing ClassificationsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1974
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960