DETERMINATION OF CARDIAC-OUTPUT AT REST AND DURING EXERCISE BY CARBON-DIOXIDE REBREATHING METHOD IN OBSTRUCTIVE AIRWAY DISEASE

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The accuracy of the CO2 breathing method (Co2rb) for measuring cardiac output at rest and during steady-state exercise was evaluated in 15 patients (mean .+-. SD age, 59.7 .+-. 7.5 yr) with obstructive airway disease. At rest, there was a significant correlation between direct Fick and CO2rb methods using measured arterial PCO2 [partial pressure of CO2] (r = 0.70; P = 0.002), but not with using end-tidal PCO2 (r = 0.38; p = NS [not significant]). During exercise, there was greater correlation with CO2rb using arterial PCO2 (r = 0.79; P = 0.001) than using end-tidal PCO2 (r = 0.63; P = 0.007) compared with the direct Fick dermination. Correlation between the CO2rb and direct Fick methods was greater with moderate air-flow obstruction (n = 6) than with severe airway disease (n = 9) and the CO2rb method was more accurate during exercise than at rest. The CO2rb method using either end-tidal or arterial PCO2 underestimated the direct Fick measurement in 13 of 15 patients at rest, which may reflect inadequate equilibration between alveolar and oxygenated mixed venous PCO2. However, no consistent error was observed during exercise when higher CO2 production and an increased venoarterial PCO2 difference would diminish potential inaccuracies. The CO2rb technique evidently is an acceptable method for measuring cardiac output during exercise in patients with moderate and severe obstructive airway disease as long as arterial PCO2 is directly measured rather than estimated from end-tidal PCO2.