A field test for competitive effects of Aedes albopictus on A. aegypti in South Florida: differences between sites of coexistence and exclusion?
- 16 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 139 (4) , 583-593
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1532-4
Abstract
We tested whether interspecific competition from Aedes albopictus had measurable effects on A. aegypti at the typical numbers of larval mosquitoes found in cemetery vases in south Florida. We also tested whether the effect of interspecific competition from A. albopictus on A. aegypti differed between sites where A. aegypti either persists or went extinct following invasion by A. albopictus. Similar experiments manipulating numbers of A. albopictus in cemetery vases were conducted at three sites of A. aegypti persistence and three sites where A. aegypti was apparently extinct. The experiments were done using numbers of larvae that were determined by observed numbers of larvae for each site, and with resources (leaf detritus) that accumulated in experimental vases placed into each field site. In both the early rainy season (when number of mosquito larvae was low) and the late rainy season (when number of mosquito larvae was high), there was a significant effect of treatment on developmental progress of experimental A. aegypti. In the late rainy season, when numbers of larvae were high, there was also a significant effect of treatment on survivorship of A. aegypti. However, the competition treatment × site type (A. aegypti persists vs extinct) interaction was never significant, indicating that the competitive effect of A. albopictus on A. aegypti did not differ systematically between persistence versus extinction sites. Thus, although competition from A. albopictus is strong under field conditions at all sites, we find no evidence that variation in the impact of interspecific competition is associated with coexistence or exclusion. Interspecific competition among larvae is thus a viable explanation for exclusion or reduction of A. aegypti in south Florida, but variation in the persistence of A. aegypti following invasion does not seem to be primarily a product of variation in the conditions in the aquatic environments of cemetery vases.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Desiccation and thermal tolerance of eggs and the coexistence of competing mosquitoesOecologia, 2002
- Genetic Structure of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) Populations Based on Mitochondrial ND5 Sequences: Evidence for an Independent Invasion into Brazil and United StatesAnnals of the Entomological Society of America, 2002
- Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species DiversityAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2000
- DIFFERENTIAL COLONIZATION SUCCESS AND ASYMMETRICAL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TWO LIZARD SPECIESEcology, 1999
- An experimental investigation of the competitive displacement of a native gecko by an invading gecko: no role for parasitesOecologia, 1998
- SPECIES INTRODUCTION AND REPLACEMENT AMONG MOSQUITOES: INTERSPECIFIC RESOURCE COMPETITION OR APPARENT COMPETITION?Ecology, 1998
- BULLFROG (RANA CATESBEIANA) INVASION OF A CALIFORNIA RIVER: THE ROLE OF LARVAL COMPETITIONEcology, 1997
- Competition and resistance to starvation in larvae of container‐inhabiting Aedes mosquitoesEcological Entomology, 1996
- Effect of pH Variation of Interspecific Competition Between Two Species of Hylid TadpolesEcology, 1993
- Disturbance and Variation in Competition Between Two Stream InsectsEcology, 1991