Human β-Defensins 2 and 3 Demonstrate Strain-Selective Activity against Oral Microorganisms
Open Access
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 42 (3) , 1024-1029
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.42.3.1024-1029.2004
Abstract
Human β-defensins 2 and 3 (HBD-2 and HBD-3) are inducible peptides present at sites of infection in the oral cavity. A few studies have reported broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity for both peptides. However, no comprehensive study has thoroughly investigated their potential against oral pathogens. The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of HBD-2 and HBD-3 against a collection of oral organisms ( Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans , Fusobacterium nucleatum , Porphyromonas gingivalis , Peptostreptococcus micros , Actinomyces naeslundii , Actinomyces israelii , Streptococcus sanguis , Streptococcus mutans , Candida tropicalis , Candida parapsilosis , Candida krusei , Candida glabrata , and Candida albicans ). Radial diffusion assays were used to test HBD-2 and HBD-3 activities against at least three strains of each species. There was significant variability in MICs, which was strain specific rather than species specific. MICs ranged from 3.9 to >250 μg/ml for HBD-2 and from 1.4 to >250 μg/ml for HBD-3. HBD-3 demonstrated greater antimicrobial activity and was effective against a broader array of organisms. Overall, aerobes were 100% susceptible to HBD-2 and HBD-3, whereas only 21.4 and 50% of the anaerobes were susceptible to HBD-2 and HBD-3, respectively. HBD-2 and HBD-3 also demonstrated strain-specific activity against the Candida species evaluated. Interestingly, an association between HBD-2 and HBD-3 activities was noted. This suggests that the two peptides may have similar mechanisms yet utilize distinct pathways. The lack of activity against specific anaerobic strains and Candida warrants further investigation of the potential resistance mechanisms of these organisms. Finally, the significant variability between strains underlies the importance of testing multiple strains when evaluating activities of antimicrobial peptides.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Expression of β‐defensins in gingival health and in periodontal diseaseJournal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, 2004
- Susceptibility of Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae to Human β-Defensins Is Influenced by Lipooligosaccharide AcylationInfection and Immunity, 2002
- Identification of a novel, multifunctional *-defensin (human *-defensin 3) with specific antimicrobial activityCell and tissue research, 2001
- Discovery of new human β-defensins using a genomics-based approachGene, 2001
- Inducible Expression of Human β-Defensin 2 byFusobacterium nucleatumin Oral Epithelial Cells: Multiple Signaling Pathways and Role of Commensal Bacteria in Innate Immunity and the Epithelial BarrierInfection and Immunity, 2000
- Bacterial Phosphorylcholine Decreases Susceptibility to the Antimicrobial Peptide LL-37/hCAP18 Expressed in the Upper Respiratory TractInfection and Immunity, 2000
- Modulation of antibacterial peptide activity by products of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella spp.Microbiology, 1999
- Widespread expression of beta‐defensin hBD‐1 in human secretory glands and epithelial cellsFEBS Letters, 1996
- Ultrasensitive assays for endogenous antimicrobial polypeptidesJournal of Immunological Methods, 1991
- Interactions between Salmonella typhimurium lipopolysaccharide and the antimicrobial peptide, magainin 2 amideFEBS Letters, 1990