Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine use: reasons and motivations between two tertiary children's hospitals
Open Access
- 24 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Vol. 91 (2) , 153-158
- https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.074872
Abstract
Aims: To compare prevalence, reasons, motivations, initiation, perceived helpfulness, and communication of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use between two tertiary children’s hospitals. Methodology: A study, using a face-to-face questionnaire, of 500 children attending the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK was compared to an identical study of 503 children attending the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Results: One year CAM use in Cardiff was lower than Melbourne (41% v 51%; OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.52–0.85), reflected in non-medicinal use (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.29–0.58) and general paediatric outpatients (OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.21–0.67). Compared to Melbourne, factors associated with lower CAM use in Cardiff included families born locally (father: OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.44–0.77) or non-tertiary educated parents (mother: OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.38–0.77). Cardiff participants used less vitamin C (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.18–0.51) and herbs (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.34–0.71), attended less chiropractors (OR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.06–0.37) and naturopaths (OR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.02–0.33), but saw more reflexologists (OR = 3.33, 95% CI 1.08–10.29). In Cardiff, CAM was more popular for relaxation (OR = 1.92, 95% CI 1.03–3.57) but less for colds/coughs (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.27–0.73). Most CAM was self-initiated (by parent) in Cardiff and Melbourne (74% v 70%), but Cardiff CAM users perceived it less helpful (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.31–0.68). Non-disclosure of CAM use was high in Cardiff and Melbourne (66% v 63%); likewise few doctors/nurses documented recent medicinal CAM use in inpatient notes (0/21 v 2/22). Conclusions: The differences in CAM use may reflect variation in sociocultural factors influencing reasons, motivations, attitudes, and availability. The regional variation in use and poor communication highlights the importance of local policy development.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The rise and rise of complementary and alternative medicine: a sociological perspectiveThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2004
- Parent-Pediatrician Communication about Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use for ChildrenClinical Pediatrics, 2004
- The use of complementary and alternative health care practices among childrenJournal of Pediatric Health Care, 2003
- Use of complementary/alternative medicine among paediatric patientsEuropean Journal of Pediatrics, 2003
- ABC of complementary medicine: Users and practitioners of complementary medicineBMJ, 1999
- Use of complementary treatment by those hospitalised with acute illnessArchives of Disease in Childhood, 1999
- Prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine for children: a systematic reviewEuropean Journal of Pediatrics, 1999
- Acupuncture in Australian general practice: practitioner characteristicsThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1998
- Why Patients Use Alternative MedicineJAMA, 1998
- Alternative and complementary therapy use in pediatric oncology patients in British Columbia: prevalence and reasons for use and nonuse.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998