Frequency Limitations and Optimal Step Size for the Two-Point Central Difference Derivative Algorithm with Applications to Human Eye Movement Data
- 1 March 1983
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Vol. BME-30 (3) , 191-194
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.1983.325108
Abstract
There are many algorithms for calculating derivatives. The two-point central difference algorithm is the simplest. Besides simplicity, the two most important characteristics of this algorithm are accuracy and frequency response. The frequency content of the data prescribes a lower limit on the sampling rate. The smoothness and accuracy of the data determine the optimal step size. We discuss the low-pass filter characteristics of this algorithm and derive the optimal step size for two types of human eye movement data. To calculate the velocity of fast (saccadic) eye movements, the algorithm should have a cutoff frequency of 74 Hz. For typical slow (smooth pursuit) eye movements, a step size of 25 or 50 ms is optimal.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Digital Low-Pass Differentiation for Biological Signal ProcessingIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1982
- Frequency limitations of the two-point central difference differentiation algorithmBiological Cybernetics, 1982
- A Comparison of Digital Algorithms Used in Computing the Derivative of Left Ventricular PressureIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1981
- Dynamic overshoot in saccadic eye movements is caused by neurological control signal reversalsExperimental Neurology, 1975
- The mechanics of human saccadic eye movementThe Journal of Physiology, 1964